Liberal Evangelism:

The descendants of the Christards – the libtards – carry on their forbearers’ practice of preaching their socialist gospel amongst the heathen – the beastmen whose conversion to their egalitarian creed is viewed as of paramount value and essential to the fulfillment of the prophecies of John Stuart Mill, Marx, and Chomsky.

These ‘savages’ in the words of John Smith of Pocahontas fame carry with them the mark of anti-Cain, of Caliban, in that they are portrayed as ‘innocent’, ‘victims’ who must have the rod spared so that they as spoiled children of the libtard/ Christard evangelical may bless them who blesses thee and curse them who curses thee (the evangelical receiving a ‘blessing’ through bestowing upon them redistributed wealth, ‘freebies’ in common parlance. this gesture, this bestowal of the fruits of their virtue pays dividends in moral coin which builds social capital amongst the evangelical who thereby accrues a sense of self-worth/importance and is enabled thereby to make ostentatious displays of same through ‘virtue signalling’ which in the moral realm is equivalent to conspicuous consumption.

A prime example being strolling around in public with a sponsored ‘beastman’ and making explicit references to/conversations with same and its ‘culture’ or ‘origins’, etc.). Thus liberal evangelism compares with Christard evangelism. The two differ as follows: 1) The gospel of either 2) the end goal – in both cases the particularity of their respective creeds and practices bound up therewith which divides them into their respective categories, Libtard and Christard. 1) With respect to the gospel in the one case it is of course [Judeo]Christian (in whatever particular form of sect with the exclusion of Christian identity being itself opposition to evangelism outside of whites) and in the other libtard meaning bible and its commandments, its neuroticism and inhibition on the one hand and on the other the ideology of pleasure maximization and pain minimization emanating from the doctrines of Mill and modified to suite time and place dovetailing with and ultimately metamorphosing into the communism of Marx just as Christinsanity metamorphoses into the Zion of SchofIeld and the Pharisees.

In both cases a kingdom of heaven upon earth with the Jews as the ‘chosen’ elite controlling everyone else as slaves is the intended result. The necessity of preaching this gospel to predominantly non-white beast people is so that more rudimentary beings are conscripted into the ‘flock’ as usable slaves who are also easily enticed with prospects of gain, both economic and power-based as adhering to a religion which kowtows before themselves is a way of implicit ego stroking on their part. – The ‘innocent victim’ of ‘powers and principalities’ this obtains for both through the underlying and concealed modus operandi of the Jew is to simply manipulate the non-white beastman into serving as a battering ram against the white race.

Where Christard evangelism failed in its fundamentally anti-natural praxis the missionaries invariably ending up with their head shrunken and put around the belt of a hottentot or boiling in a pot for their feast so too Libtardism follows this uphill struggle against natural law and thus finds itself with its creed of ‘egality, fraternity, democracy, etc.’ torn to shreds by the beastfolk in utmost savagery. Truly nature guarantees no ‘human rights’ to life and the universal evangelist finds themselves in a kingdom ‘not of this world’ once the revolution mows over them like wildfire. Thus the fruits by which both Christard and libtard evangels will be judged are the rotting of the apple of less mind-controlled forbearers who adhered to natural law. To ride the bandwagon of anti-nature is to precipitate oneself off a cliff operating on the basis of the delusion that one could ride to the stars in defiance of the law of gravity. Truly the grave is the ultimate conclusion.