The blow of the Russian gods. Strike of the Russian gods
regarding Vladimir Istarkhov 
https://ik-ptz.ru/en/diktanty-po-russkomu-yazyku--4-klass/udar-rossiiskih-bogov-udar-russkih-bogov.html

Strike of the Russian Gods

Vladimir Alekseevich Istarkhov - (probably a pseudonym) Russian writer and publicist of a nationalist persuasion, academician of the Aryan-Russian-Slavic Academy.

Harsh criticism of Judaism, Christianity, Zionism, Freemasonry, communism, Semitism. Wants to awaken dormant forces in the Russian people on the basis of Vedic beliefs. He likes to collect "every bast in a line." Probably has the gift of prophecy. The main book is "The Blow of the Russian Gods".

Annotation: The book reveals the essence of all major Jewish religions: Judaism, Christianity, communism, paints the structure of Masonic organizations. It is shown that the Jewish religions were created as an informational weapon for the capture and establishment of world domination by the highest Jewish oligarchy and their satanic masters. The mechanisms of control of consciousness and behavior of people are revealed. The book is written from the standpoint of paganism - the original multi-thousand-year-old religion of the Russian and Aryan peoples. .

Table of contents
2. Faith or religion
3. Absurdities of Christianity
4. The idea of ​​the salvation of mankind through Christ
5. Christian morality. What does Christ teach?
6. Ideas of heaven and hell
7. Monotheism and polytheism
8. What is Judaism and Zionism? Who are "God's chosen" Jews?
9. Catechism (rules of conduct) of a Jew in the USSR
10. The Mystery of Jewish Circumcision
11. Crowd-elite model of human society
12. General people management tools
13. What is Freemasonry?
14. The power structure of the secret world government
15. What is communism?
16. Methods of Christian, communist, "democratic" demagogy and manipulation
17. Is it possible to do without religions?
18. A little about Russian religion
19. Fragments of world history
20. What to do?
21. Main quotes of this book

Simplified and adapted for teenagers "Desionization" by Emelyanov. (much from the Funny Gospel) Aggressive enough, not recommended for the faint of heart. Judeo-Christians and Jewish chasers have long wanted to ban it, initiate various lawsuits, but so far they have not succeeded.

Many Christian forums try to give a lengthy rebuff to criticism of Christianity, but not very constructively.

Vladimir Istarkhov (Vladimir Ivanov), Scandalous book aroused indignation among Orthodox nationalists. At one of the meetings of the Union "Christian Renaissance" (SHV) she was subjected to ritual burning along with pornographic literature and the newspaper "Moskovsky Komsomolets".
Read from the screen chapter by chapter http://thehit.netfirms.com/content.html
Comments and constructive criticism of the book itself http://www.balandin.net/Istarhov.htm

CAUTION - ISTARHOV! reasonable criticism of the book "Blow of the Russian Gods"
CAUTION - ISTARHOV!
Among the authors who are read by patriotic people, Vladimir Istarkhov has recently appeared. And its popularity is growing exponentially.

I will say right away that I like a lot from Istarkhov.

I like his nationalism, I like his criticism of Christianity and Judaism, I like his criticism of Zionism, even his racism does not cause rejection - a little healthy racism never hurts. He brilliantly debunks the myths about the genius of the Jews in general and exaggerated Jewish authorities in particular.

What's not to like?

Let's go in order.

Paganism

I started reading the book "Strike of the Russian Gods", hoping to gain new knowledge about Russian paganism from it. But I didn't really find that. Almost the entire book is about Jews, Judaism, Freemasonry. By the way, a lot of information is given, the book really has, in the words of the author, "content dense in information." For example, I learned a lot of new things. But about paganism - mostly general phrases, if specific, then more and more Indian. A small list of pagan gods and holidays that can be found in any reference book on the subject. It seems that Istarkhov's knowledge of Russian paganism is the most superficial, bookish.

Stalin

Istarkhov is especially partial to Stalin. He mentions it in almost all the chapters of his books. Moreover, it is bursting with such inadequate malice towards Stalin that it causes, to put it mildly, bewilderment. Why did Stalin annoy Istarkhov so much?

The main claims of Istarkhov to the leader:

They made a living god out of Stalin during his lifetime

So these claims should be presented not to Stalin, but to those who made a god out of him! Or is Istarkhov not at all familiar with the psychology of the masses?

Stalin, it turns out, is a Jew.

The idea is not new and not original, but Istarkhov's argumentation is striking.

Dzhugashvili, it turns out, translated from Georgian - the son of a Jew. Where did Istarkhov suck it from, from which finger is a mystery. “If Stalin had been a pure Georgian, he would never have made it to the highest ranks of the Communards,” writes Istarkhov. The fact that the Georgians Ordzhonikidze, the Armenian Mikoyan, etc., got into the highest composition of the Communards does not bother him.

Stalin was not just a Jew, he was - imagine - a "mason of a high degree"!

And at the same time, Istarkhov refers to some American. That is, I must believe in this matter the Americans - the most virtuoso liars in the world!

Stalin was a degenerate less than 160 cm tall.

This is from a series of Khrushchev myths. Stalin was taller than average - about 175 cm (the average then was 162 cm).

In addition, constantly, out of place and out of place, the "Stalinist gang" and its crimes are mentioned.

Moreover, in most cases it is not explained what kind of crimes, just general words.

For example, "Stalin was a notorious communist, and, therefore, a scoundrel and a criminal." That's the whole logic. Or some horror stories are told, invented by Khrushchev and debunked long ago. The funny thing is that Istarkhov often blames Stalin for what Stalin himself fought against.

Stalin worsened the quality of the people of Russia.

This Istarkhov writes in Dead Water. And in "Blow of the Russian Gods" he thanks Stalin for the fact that he "crushed the Jews." How to understand this contradiction? What kind of "deterioration in quality" are we talking about, even if our enemies admitted that in the Stalinist USSR there was an unprecedented rise in culture, science and technology? What a deterioration, if during the Russo-Japanese war Russian troops fled with shouts of "cavalry!" (although the Japanese did not have cavalry), and in less than forty years, Russian soldiers showed miracles of heroism, which, again, delighted even our enemies?

Istarkhov is mistaken (or lying). On the contrary, Stalin improved the quality of the people of Russia.

- "After the Second World War, with the consent and active participation of Stalin, the Zionists managed to realize their blue dream: to create a Jewish state in Palestine."

This is what Hitler fought for! Hitler made an alliance with the Zionists: he conquers Palestine for them, they finance him - "Duel" has already written a lot about this. Istarkhov shifts from a sick head to a healthy one.

I don’t even want to write about collectivization - I’m tired, it’s boring. Much has been written about this in Duel.

In general, in his criticism of Stalin, Istarkhov relies on fakes and myths composed back in the time of Khrushchev, which are now operated only by the “democratic” press.

Stalinists

The same with the Stalinists. It is clear that Istarkhov hates them, but it is not clear why specifically. Or he writes complete nonsense. "Who are the Stalinists?" - asks Istarkhov. And he answers: "These are scoundrels and criminals, accomplices and perpetrators of Stalin's ... crimes."

That is, I, a Stalinist, born many years after Stalin's death, according to the logic of Istarkhov, am an accomplice in the so-called "crimes"?

They may object to me - you did not live under Stalin, you do not know anything about that time, therefore you are mistaken, justifying Stalin.

On the contrary, while I did not know anything about that time, I was not a Stalinist. But the more I study it, the more I learn about that time, the more I become a Stalinist. And Istarkhov's books are designed for people who judge Stalin by Khrushchev's horror stories.

Apart from Khrushchev's horror stories and general words, Istarkhov does not describe any specific "crimes" of Stalin. So I'm wondering - maybe it's personal? If one of Istarkhov's relatives was shot, then let him write that he was shot for espionage or for burning bread on collective farms. Then there are no questions.

The most complete and meaningful information about the personality of Stalin is given to us by Yuri Kozenkov, in the book "The Struggle for Power". see here
Przhevalsky

Mentioned in the books of Istarkhov and Nikolai Mikhailovich Przhevalsky. As you may have guessed, Istarkhov also declares him a Jew. Are you laughing? But Istarkhov writes about this in all seriousness.

The fact is that there is such a version: Przhevalsky may have been Stalin's father. And Istarkhov has no choice but to record Przhevalsky as a "Polish Jew." Istarkhov writes: “It is enough to look at the face of this “Russian” Przhevalsky with his purely Jewish schnobel, and immediately see that Przhevalsky is not Russian.” Looked. A schnobel is like a schnobel. Well, not a Jewish muzzle at Przhevalsky. Where did Istarkhov even get that he was a Jew?

The Przhevalskys are a rather old Polish noble family that served as Stefan Batory. Then either this whole family, or its branch moved to Russia. She moved, apparently, long before the birth of Nikolai Mikhailovich, because his grandfather's name was Kuzma. Wow, a very Jewish name.

By the way, Beria at Istarkhov's too ... guessed it - a Jew.

Solzhenitsyn

When you read Istarkhov, you get the feeling that his books are designed for people who are completely unfamiliar with the history of the USSR. For example, he refers to Solzhenitsyn - here, they say, what a truthful whistleblower, he revealed the whole terrible picture of that time. But it has long been known that Solzhenitsyn was published abroad with the money of the CIA, and only those who are not interested do not know this.

Blessed Occupation

In his praise of German Nazism, Istarkhov reaches complete insanity. In his opinion, "in the German occupation, people lived freely and happily." He would say this to those who were there, in the occupation; I wonder what they would do with it?

Is Istarkhov holding us for idiots? After all, we still remember that the Germans carried out mass executions, drove people to Germany into slavery. Torture, executions, genocide - that's what the German occupation was. And who lived "in clover"? Oh yes, there were also policemen ...

I asked my grandfather about the occupation. He said something about her without enthusiasm. He did not live happily with his mother then. Let Istarkhov forgive him for spoiling his statistics.

By the way, I asked my grandfather about the "Stalinist slave regime" for the peasants.

- Grandfather, - I ask, - did you live in the village before the war?
Yes, he lived.
- Did you have any passports?
“It wasn’t,” he says.
- And if you had to go to the city?
- Well, it was necessary - we went.
- And I heard, - I say, - that it seemed that it was necessary to obtain some kind of permission from the chairman, so that you could go to the city ...
- No, not permission, but a certificate that such and such works there, etc.
- And if, - I did not let up, - do not take such a certificate?
- Yes, it was possible without help ...
So much for the myth about passportless serfs.
White

According to Istarkhov, the Whites fought "against the Jews", and the Reds "on the side of the Jews". And the whites were a kind of Russian nationalists, and the reds were cosmopolitans. However, these same white nationalists draped themselves against the "Jewish" West, and the West readily accepted them. But the red “cosmopolitan Jews”, even in the most difficult times for themselves, did not even think about emigration - after all, they would have been put right up against the wall there, in the “Jewish” West.

Istarkhov often contradicts himself. For example, he writes:

"They did not give up without a fight" and literally in the following sentence:

“The remnants of the whites went into exile” - that is, they surrendered.

But still, "Eternal glory to the heroes of the White Movement!". Yes, good characters...

Stolypin

Whom Istarkhov glorifies is Stolypin. Here he does not skimp:

“The main emphasis of his reforms is on the destruction of peasant communes and the creation of independent peasant farms, the creation of a middle class. The practical success of his reforms exceeded all expectations. Russia began to develop rapidly. The middle class began to develop...

Eternal memory and eternal glory to Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin and bow to him from the Russian people! The Great Spirit of Stolypin is always with us!

And how was it really?

“The peasants resisted the transition to farms and cuts, not because of their darkness and ignorance, as the authorities believed, but on the basis of sound life considerations. Peasant farming was very dependent on the vagaries of nature. Having stripes in different parts of the public allotment, the peasant provided himself with an average annual harvest: in a dry year, strips in the lowlands helped out, in a rainy year - on the hills, ”writes a modern researcher, candidate of historical sciences Pavel Zyryanov. Thus, the Stolypin reform not only did not bring positive results (the harvests in 1906-1911 increased as compared to the harvests of 1900-1905 as much as the peasant population grew), but also had negative consequences - the lumpenization of a part of the former peasants. And the repetition of Stolypin's experiments is unlikely to lead to better results.

And here is what Sergey Kara-Murza writes about this:

Let us remember in what terms the peasants explained their rejection of Stolypin's reform. Foresight and common sense are amazing in today's times. This is how the volost gathering of the Rybatsky volost of the Petersburg provinces substantiated its disagreement with the Decree on the beginning of the reform. in May 1907 in his order to the State Duma:

“According to the peasants, this law will not be approved by the State Duma, since it tends to the detriment of poor and low-income peasants. We see that every householder can separate himself from the community and receive land as his property; we feel that in this way all the youth and all the offspring of the present population are destitute. After all, the land belongs to the entire community as a whole, not only to the current composition, but also to children and grandchildren.

The whole community ruled over the whole land, and for such land the whole community paid taxes, bore all sorts of duties and disposed of the land, subtracting from those with large land and adding to those with little land, and therefore no one can demand that land be allocated to private property, and therefore our volost cannot allow this. It cannot even allow the thought that small-family, but large-land peasants would enrich themselves at the expense of large-family, but small-land peasants ... The State Duma, we think, will not abolish communal ownership of land.

This argument, according to which the land is the property of the whole people and its sale and purchase violates the rights of future generations, is heard in various variations in a multitude of orders and sentences of the peasants. How much more stupid we have become today! Earth? To hell with her, take it!

That is, the dark and uneducated peasants were much smarter and more reasonable than the “great statesman of Russia,” as Istarkhov calls him.

What is being preached?

Let the reader not be misled by the fact that Istarkhov calls himself a pagan. Those who are familiar with Protestantism know that among Protestants "God's grace" is measured in money. And success is considered the main virtue - this, in their opinion, is pleasing to God. Istarkhov preaches the same thing. To his opponents, for example, he addresses the phrase:
“If you are so smart, then why are you so poor?”

Do you recognize? America's favorite slogan.

S. PAVLOV

P.S. I remember that at the military department, one officer told us how "disinformation" (disinformation) is arranged. If the disinformation contains only lies, then no one will believe in it. Therefore, lies must be diluted with a small amount of truth. It will give credibility to all misinformation, and it will be difficult to determine what exactly is true in it and what is false. (If you do the opposite - dilute the truth with a small amount of lies, then this lie will be easy to reveal.)

There is indeed a lot of truth in Istarkhov's books, but there are even more lies in them.

Note. Ogneyar. The worst thing about this book is that the author himself does not believe in what he writes. This is a purely commercial "project", which has already brought a lot to Istarkhov. And bring more.

People, while spreading views that are recognized as extremist. The life path of this person is tortuous and full of difficulties.

Family and childhood
Vladimir Alekseevich Ivanov (Istarkhov) was born in 1949 in Moscow. The main thing that he always talks about his ancestors is that they were all Russian. This is extremely important for him, because he promotes the original Russian idea and should have the right to disseminate his national concept. His father was a military man, his mother was a pharmacist of the highest category. Vladimir had an older sister, she worked as a pharmacist. In Soviet times, it was a typical family that experienced all the difficulties and joys with the country: recovery after the war, the difficulties of the Soviet period, but parents were able to give their children a decent education, and this was an important moment to start in those days. Vladimir studied at the 310th school in Moscow, from which he graduated in 1966.

Education
Immediately after school, Vladimir entered a worthy university - the Moscow Institute of Electronic Engineering, at the Faculty of Applied Mathematics. While studying at the university, he attended the evening music education school No. 1 in the Moskvoretsky district of the capital, learned to play the guitar. Later, this skill came in handy when he collaborated with many vocal and instrumental ensembles. At the same time, his musical taste was formed. His passion is folk, classical and jazz music.

Also during this period, Ivanov was trained at the military department of MIEM, after which he received the military rank of captain of the reserve signal troops.

Throughout his life, Ivanov went in for sports a lot, he has ranks in chess, tennis, is fond of swimming and hand-to-hand combat.

Vladimir studied well at the university, showed promise and decided to engage in science.

Scientific career
After graduating from high school in 1972, Vladimir Ivanov got a job at the Research Institute of Automatic Equipment as a laboratory engineer. For 16 years of work at NIIAA, he went from a laboratory assistant to the head of the sector. His research topic was automatic control systems for strategic troops, and to this day these systems have been adopted by the Russian army. On this topic, he defended his Ph.D. thesis in 1982. In 1983-1984, he taught part-time at the Moscow State Institute of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Automation. It was a kind of obligatory position, because this university trained personnel for NIIAA, and in the 5th-6th courses, students were assigned to an employee of the institute so that he could choose worthy ones for future work.

In 1985, Ivanov transferred to the Research Institute of Automation Systems to the position of Deputy Director for Science. He became the chief designer for computer-aided design systems, was engaged in the development of special purpose systems. He also worked in Tikhomirov's group on the creation of machine translation systems for scientific and technical literature. Later, his activities were connected with bringing the program to a completed sample and organizing its implementation on a commercial basis. It was a time of science diversification, each research institute was looking for ways to make money, and Ivanov found himself in this field.

Hard times came for science, it was possible to earn a living only by making more and more efforts, and in 1988 Ivanov left his job at the research institute to engage in social and political activities.

The way of the communist
In 1973, Ivanov was sent to study on the job at the University of Marxism-Leninism. This educational institution existed in order to ideologically shoe the leading cadres and the population as a whole. It was an absolutely ideological university, where lecturers explained what were the advantages of a communist society over all others. Ivanov studied at the Faculty of Philosophy and in 2 years was able to analyze in detail the concept of Marxism and Leninism. He graduated from the university in 1975 with honors. This training radically changed the views of Vladimir, he understood how the Soviet system works, learned what needs to be done to succeed in it, but he hated the very ideas of Marxism. So, he left the ideological educational institution as an ardent anti-Soviet, but so far he has not advertised these views. It's hard to do this while serving in a secret military institute if you don't want to lose your favorite job.

In 1979 Vladimir Ivanov joined the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. He did this not for ideological reasons, but because it was a prerequisite for those who wanted to make a career in science, and especially in a secret institute.

In 1989, the CPSU reminded Ivanov that he was a party member. He was urged to stop his social activities, but could not be persuaded. In this regard, he was expelled from the party for anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. This led to the beginning of the persecution. In 1990, Ivanov had to resign from public service, as existence there became unbearable.

Social work
From the beginning of perestroika, Ivanov began to openly demonstrate his skills. In 1988, he was elected secretary of the socio-political movement "Russian People's Front", whose members were also V. Skurlatov, S. Vdovin.

At this time, Ivanov became a prominent media figure, and then Istarkhov Vladimir Alekseevich appeared on the arena of social activity. The surname Ivanov has become too inconspicuous for the activist.

In 1990, Vladimir Istarkhov tried to become a deputy of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation, but the communists were able to remove him from the elections.

In the 90s, the activist spoke a lot at rallies, conferences, congresses, propagated his views, which took shape in an increasingly integral theory.

Vladimir Istarkhov, as a patriot, actively defended the White House in 1991 and 1993, he welcomed the changes, hoping for the best.

Since the 90s, Ivanov has collaborated with various small businesses, but his main activity - education - was still ahead.

The book "Blow of the Russian Gods"
The political views of Vladimir Alekseevich developed into a theory in line with neo-paganism and Russophilism. And Vladimir Istarkhov, whose biography is inextricably linked with the nationalist movement, writes his programmatic work. This clearly anti-Semitic work calls on the Russian nation to remember its roots and reject everything superficial: Christianity, the constitutional structure of the state, expel the Jews and start living by their own rules. For all the controversial content, the author of "Strike of the Russian Gods" cannot be deprived of the talent of persuasion, he writes vividly, and this works well for certain audiences.

Persecution and accusations
Since the late 1990s, Vladimir Istarkhov has been persecuted. He is criticized for his radical views and extremist calls, the authorities often detain him at nationalist rallies. Books by Vladimir Istarkhov have repeatedly become the subject of litigation. He went through a whole series of trials that drew even more attention to his person and theory. In one interview, Istarkhov spoke with great passion and in gloomy colors that he was subjected to a deliberate series of trials in order to finally recognize the work “Strike of the Russian Gods” as an extremist in 2013.

today
Today Vladimir Istarkhov heads the Russian Human Rights League and is working on the creation of the Russian Right Party. He wrote another controversial book - "What is" dead water "?". Vladimir Istarkhov's lectures arouse great interest among the nationalist-minded part of society, they are replicated on the Internet, quoted and retold. The author finally achieved what he wanted - he is the called "ruler of thoughts."

“Strike of the Russian Gods” by Istarkhov - Jews, phobias and complexes ...

The whole point of Istarkhov's book "Blow of the Russian Gods" boils down to the following:

1) “The priests of Egypt (especially the occult part of these priests) many thousands of years ago set themselves the goal of achieving world domination. This idea, of course, is not new and lives as long as people live.
“After another split at the top of the Egyptian priesthood, a group of occult priests emerged, who took a fundamentally different satanic path to achieve the same goal of world domination. They realized that not ordinary material weapons, but informational weapons are much more effective. They realized that it is easier not to kill people, but to deceive them. Lies and deceit have become their basic method. The new world religions invented by the priests became the basis of information weapons.

The first of these false religions they invented was Judaism. Judaism, of course, did not arise from scratch. They took paganism as a base, but transformed it in such a way that the new religion would meet their goals. To introduce this information weapon and to implement their plans for the implementation of the global program, they needed a human army of a new, special type. These soldiers were supposed to work in the "cold" and implicit war. These implicit soldiers should not be perceived as soldiers by anyone. And these hidden soldiers themselves should not be aware of their controllability. In other words, they needed biorobots.

At that time, the ancient Jews were in Egyptian slavery. The priests decided to use this human material for their plan. A representative of this priesthood, Moses, was singled out; the priests themselves hid in the ancestral tribe of Levi. Further, in the Sinai desert, for 40 years, this satanic experiment was carried out to breed biorobots. The ancient Jews themselves found their grave in this desert. We have already written about this Sinai hike, and it is well described in (32). The result was a tribe of new Jewish biorobots, unaware of their controllability. Further, this tribe was dispersed around the world. The Satanists did not need Jews only in Palestine. They needed an army distributed throughout the world. Therefore, the attempts of some ideologists of today's Jewry to collect all the Jews in one place are in vain. The owners of the Jews will not allow the Jews to do this. They will again be dispersed around the world. Satanists need an army of internationalists (internationalists) interspersed in every nation. “This algorithm was not invented by Jews, Jews are incapable of inventing anything new. Their brains have been mutilated by the Talmud, the Torah, and the circumcision process. Jews are just intellectual invalids. This algorithm (or program of action) is introduced into their consciousness through their "shepherds" - rabbis, for whom Jews are just a herd of biorobots. Let us note in passing that the rabbis (Levites) are not just an elite of Jews. These are their shepherds, people are genetically different. People of a different genotype

“As a result, Jews today are just a biological instrument of unstructured control for the descendants of the occult part of the Egyptian priests. Ordinary Jews themselves do not understand who they are and what role they play. On the upper levels of world Jewry, the upper strata of Jewry understand everything, but they do not know how life could be arranged differently. And they are satisfied with the place that they occupy, and the benefits and privileges that they have. And the fact that for these benefits they give their souls to the devil and nothing good shines for them during reincarnation, they try not to think about it. And they do not believe in the afterlife and reincarnation. Lived 70 - 80 years in full prosperity and okay. The Levites understand everything perfectly, but they play their own game, and the Jews for them are just material, a herd of biorobots, over which they put shepherds - rabbis.

“The Levites are the descendants of the occult ancient Egyptian priests. And it is useless to appeal to their conscience. They know who they are and whom they serve. And they serve Lucifer, Satan, the devil.”

“No matter how you look at the Sinai story, let's think about who really could be the master of the newly created religion - Judaism? The only contenders are the descendants of the Egyptian priests of God Amun. They, striving for world domination, not only created a new religion, but also for the first time in history developed and introduced into this religion a method of seizing power with the help of a cold information war. Such wars have become incomprehensible and invisible to the common population. That is why this narrow occult group still rules in the Christian world and has already come close to world domination.

“It is generally accepted that the Jews were the first to come up with a one-god (monotheistic) religion. In fact, the one-God religion was not invented by the Jews, but for the Jews. The Jews themselves are not capable of inventing something original, they lack a creative beginning.

Historically, the first monotheist was the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep IV (1389 - 1358 BC), who changed his name to Akhenaten (the one that is pleasing to the god Aten). Akhenaten was a revolutionary and led a grand revolution in the religious, secular and economic life of Egypt. Like all "professional revolutionaries", Akhenaten, according to Klimov (8), had all the signs of physical degeneration: the figure of a hermaphrodite (very wide female hips and protruding breasts); the irregular, beveled and elongated shape of the head, which he hid under a special headdress; too thin and weak neck. Obviously, this degenerate degenerate body of Akhenaten could not have come from two Egyptians of pure blood.

If you look at Baphomet, the Satanists' symbolic representation of the devil, and compare Baphomet to Akhenaten, the resemblance is more than obvious. According to modern data, Akhenaten and his sister-wife Nefertiti were representatives of an unearthly satanic civilization from the constellation Sirius. Akhenaten was married to his sister Nefertiti, who had the same ugly head (hidden under a special headdress) and a thin long neck. And all their daughters had the same signs of degeneration. Naturally, the Jews promoted Nefertiti as a symbol of female beauty. Everything is as it should be among the Jews: the ugly should be considered beautiful.

Akhenaten forbade knowledge of the multitude of Gods and forbade the main God of Egypt, the sun god Amon. Instead of Amon, Akhenaten promoted a single god - the god of the solar disk Aton. Akhenaten not only completely forbade the mention of the God Amon, but also forbade the very name of Amon to be pronounced and written on papyrus and stone. But this was not enough for him. Akhenaten was one of the first to remake history. “He ordered to erase and destroy the name of Amon on thousands of cultural monuments. On the walls, on the columns, in the depths of the tombs, the vigilant eye of the people of Akhenaten rushed everywhere to inexorably erase the name of the God Amun and the Goddess Mut, his wife. To break the name of God meant to kill his soul, to nullify his victories and conquests” (60, p. 49). This meant the alteration and falsification of the whole history of Egypt. The sanctuaries of the ancient Egyptian gods were desecrated and plundered.

Akhenaten did not tolerate dissent, he did not tolerate freedom of information, he strove for the concentration of power, he was one of the first ideologists of communism. Akhenaten did not manage to mock Egypt for a long time. After 16 years, he was overthrown, and Tutankhamen came to power. The temples of the Aten were also destroyed, and the name Akhenaten was also not only desecrated, but also forbidden to be called. They called him none other than “the overthrown criminal Akhetaton” (60, p. 63).

But the case of the "overthrown criminal" Akhenaten, unfortunately, did not die. The spiritual disciples and heirs of Akhenaten were the ancient Essenes, who lived in communes. The ancient Essenes subsequently trained the Satanist Jesus Christ.

And again - no arguments and justifications. The author apparently forgot that, having studied the properties of the lever, Archimedes demanded a fulcrum to turn the Earth over. Istarkhov encroached on the same thing, and pulled out the lever, and the fulcrum ... And "what is the fulcrum" ?! Let false Jewish science deal with it! A real Aryan knows how to investigate, because "ANTISEMITISM IS AN INDICATOR OF HIGH INTELLIGENCE" (quote from "Strike")! It's worth considering though:
a) Akhenaten destroyed all cults, including the worship of Amun, and put his god, Aten, in their place. For this, the priests declared him a lifetime and posthumous war. After the death of Akhenaten, his son Tutankhaton, under pressure from the priesthood, returned all the previous religions and changed his name to Tutankhamun (although Istarkhov did not lie here). That's how it all ended. Question: given that the union of Akhenaten and the priests is excluded, which of the hostile parties invented and carried out the Jewish experiment?

b) Information about the origin of Akhenaten from Sirius by Istarkhov is taken for granted - without justification, although for scientists and ordinary readers, this cannot be taken simply on faith.

c) It is not entirely clear why Baphomet was dragged in: this demon is found only in the documents of the inquisitional trial of the Templars, and even then - the knights could not decide on his appearance, naming either a bearded head, or a skull, or some obscure statuette.

Istarkhov also gives a version about the Hierophants who left Egypt, who later founded the Masonic orders. “Apparently, the hierophants are the descendants of the surviving occult priests of the lost Atlantis. These children of Lucifer-Satan brought the civilization of Mars and Atlantis to ruin (43), and the solar-fiery Gods destroyed these satanic civilizations. Now they continue to do the same with our civilization. And we must stop them if we don't want the fate of Mars and Atlantis."

Again, no justification was provided. They say “if you don’t like it, don’t listen, but don’t interfere with lying.”

2) A certain Christ gathered the dregs of society and began to instill within his circle a passive opposition to the social order, pederasty and cannibalism. However, “the plans of Christ in Israel were not destined to be realized. The Jewish high priests quickly figured out Christ and crucified him in time. But later they decided not to throw out his religion, but to use it to corrupt other non-Jewish peoples. Use it as an information weapon."

Well, let's start with the fact that Istarkhov's pederasty and cannibalism of Christ are justified only by peculiar interpretations of parables and sayings. And a similar scam can be carried out with the fairy tale "Gingerbread Man".

Further: a little earlier, in his own book, our national pagan argued with a similar interpretation of examples from the Old Testament that pederasty and cannibalism among Jews is the norm and a time-honored tradition. The question arises: why was Christ crucified? Excuse my liberty, didn't they share their asses?

But back to religion. Istarkhov here demonstrates an example of brilliant sclerosis, giving out as a fact a different version: “Christianity was also not invented immediately, not in a month or a year. The “holy” books of this satanic religion have been rewritten more than once, and each time this weapon has been honed. The result was what we can now read in the Bible.

As a result, a second information weapon was created, which has already begun to work on its own and among non-Jews.”

And it all ended like this:

3) “If you seriously understand the question of who really rules in Christian countries now, then you will easily see that in the entire Christian world, the so-called democracy, liquidocracy rules today. How did the Jews manage to take power? Due to what? Through religions. But not only one religion - Judaism, but due to several Jewish religions connected into a single complex: Judaism, Christianity and communism.

The antagonism of such creeds as Judaism, Christianity and communism is purely demagogic and visible. Contradictions between these creeds are deliberately exaggerated. But in fact, these three creeds have the same roots and one master - world Jewry, and even higher - occult satanic masters.

"Jews and Freemasons are proud of the fact that they supposedly hold secret and open power over the world."

“All living languages ​​have been perverted, all explanatory dictionaries have been perverted. The whole system of knowledge and the system of values, all concepts of good and evil, of what is good and what is bad, have been perverted. The generally accepted worldview fools everyone - both geniuses and idiots. Everything was done not only with the help of mass creeds.

“Scientific knowledge of the Judeo-Christian world is also enslaved. All primary basic concepts and categories are closed for understanding and perverted. Physicists do not understand and cannot give clear definitions of what is time, what is space, what is energy, what is matter, what is spirit, what is information, what is randomness (what is its nature). Mathematicians do not understand: what is a number, what is a point, what is a line. Linguists do not understand what a letter is, much less what a word is.”

“Pay attention to the fact that Russians are one of the most beautiful peoples in the world. And beauty is a divine sign. Conversely, look at the average Jew - all the signs of degeneration are there. This is the mark of the devil."

No arguments are given, except for some "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", which are known only from quotes from Istarkhov himself. And then, he immediately makes the following reservation: “First of all, let's think about the authenticity of this document. The Jews will never discuss the merits of either the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or this document. They immediately switch the discussion to another and say: "This document is a fake." And the evidence begins that this is not a fake, but they prove that it is a fake, and this evidence can be carried on indefinitely, leading people away from discussing the essence of the document.

The method of switching the topic of discussion and diverting the discussion in a different direction is a standard demagogy technique. Don't fall for it."

No less vile is the method of the same demagogy proposed by the national-pagan": in every possible way to move away from the basic side of the document - its authenticity, forcing the opponent to take its contents on faith. Well, I do not argue at all that if we exclude the analysis of the question of authenticity and consistency, then many statements, including “nationalists are deprived of sex mediocrity” can be considered true.

Well, I'll tell you about the scientists, who, it turns out, don't know anything. Judging by the level of Istarkhov's "scholarship", vividly presented in "Strike", it turns out that any degenerate can be considered a leading specialist in science if he shaves his head and shouts about the resistance of the "liquidocracy". After all, "ANTISEMITISM IS AN INDICATOR OF HIGH INTELLIGENCE"!
Describing this, Istarkhov everywhere refers to Slavic paganism as the basic basis for the struggle against "world Jewry." But WHAT paganism ..!

Criticism of Istarkhov paganism:

1) "And real nationalism is impossible without one's own national religion, without connection with one's native Russian Gods."
Well, what kind of Native Russian Gods should help nationalism? Let me hint: whose function is it to sow enmity and hatred? Who wants to ruin Russia by cutting off "not pure Russians"? Who denies the equality of all people before the Truth? Who cleans the brains, throwing everything human out of them under the guise of garbage? Who distorts customs and faith? Still don't know? The divine patron of Istarkhov is Chernobog, and even then, it seems to me that even he will disdain SUCH a “protégé”.

Below, the author of "Strike of the Russian Gods" is trying to list those who, in his opinion, should help him from above. Let's consider this in more detail:
a) "You do not need to believe or not believe in the existence of the God of fire Simargl (...). SIMARGL (SEMARGL, in Hinduism Agni) is the God of fire."

Simargl - the patron of fertility in the guise of a winged dog, or a chronicle typo in the name of Sem-Yarilo (see "Semargl" from the section "Gods of the Eastern and Southern Slavs" and paragraph 10 of D. Dudko's criticism of the Veleskniga in the section "paganism of the Slavs today ").
b) “THE ALL-Highest is the Cosmic Absolute, uniting all the Gods and the entire cosmos into a single whole. The name of the Almighty is OUM. All other Gods are manifestations (hypostases) and subpersonalities of the Almighty. What is hypostasis is best explained by analogy. Here is a man, he is a man. But then a man took up a plow - he became a plowman, without ceasing to be a man. He began to sow - he is a sower, began to forge - he is a blacksmith, plays the guitar - a guitarist, reads a book - a reader. The plowman, the sower, the reader are hypostases of one and the same person.

Firstly, not all the same, not OUM (in Judaism, the word with which Brahma created the world, as well as the sound that vibrates the space around the creator), but Rod. And secondly, the form of manifestation of the senior demiurge contradicts the Slavic concepts about it (see “The form of manifestation of the senior demiurge” from the section “Paganism of the Slavic peoples”).

c) “VELES (in Asia Minor Baal, in India Valu) is the God of wisdom. The son of Rod and the sacred cow Zimun. The patron of the estate (caste) of the Magi (wise men, spiritual teachers, in Sanskrit brahmins). Patron of poets. Patron saint of pets. God of wealth."

No legends say that Veles is the son of Rod, and even more so, cows. Such characters as the cow Zemun (Zimun) and the goat Sedun are mentioned only in the Veleskniga (the goat is only in the “translation” of Asov), and how well-founded it is as a primary source is discussed above.
d) “RA is the common name of the Sun God.

From here come the words: “culture” (the cult of God Ra), “rainbow” (the arc of God Ra), “dawn”, “joy”, “hospitable”, “work” (since work is done during the day, at night a person sleeps), “ plant", "Scattering" (this is how our country is correctly called).

Let's start with the fact that in Egyptian writing the sounds "r" and "l" were written in one sign, which already crosses out all the etymological research of Istarkhov. And yet - the plant comes from the word "growth", and Rasseya is an illiterate distortion of the Byzantine name of Russia.
e) “CHERNOBOG (in Hinduism Shiva) is the product of the world duck. God of death, destruction, annihilation."

The origin of Chernobog from a duck is not recorded in any of the legends of the Slavic peoples.
f) “Satan is the god of lies, deceit, devilish temptations. The personification of evil, hatred and all evils. His face is terrible. Satan is a liar and the father of lies. Satan knows how, like a wolf, to put on various sheep's skins and make Belbog out of himself (as, for example, Christ and Moses make out of themselves). He likes the game "in reverse", calling: white - black; black - white; the truth is a lie; lie is true; good - evil; evil - good, god - the devil, the devil - god, etc. One must be able to distinguish lies from truth, and this requires both the head and the soul. Why does Satan claim to be the "only" god? To hide from a person knowledge about the existence of other Gods, to hide knowledge about good and evil, to prevent a person from choosing other white Gods.

His power is to hide knowledge from people. Instead of knowledge, he slips “faith” on people and catches the souls of gullible fools on the hook of faith. Credulity and stupidity are twin sisters. His main method of managing people is divide and conquer. He is very afraid of the truth, the spread of true knowledge, the symbol of the sun - the “Swastika”, which illuminates his dark and dirty deeds.

Actually not ours.
g) “ROOF (in Hinduism, Krishnu) - the God of the roof over his head. Hence the words "roof", "lid".

See my critique of Vleskniga above.
h) “VIY (NIY, NIYAN) is a merciless God, the son of Chernobog and the goat Seduni. Voivode of the troops of Chernobog, ruler of the furnace, lord of torment. The personification of those terrible punishments that await after the death of all the villains, murderers and scoundrels, all Jesus and Jews.

To put it mildly, A. Asov went too far with divine bestiality. Well, of course, he has his own complexes, but why should everyone take them upon themselves?
i) "USLAD (OSLAD) - the God of fun and all kinds of bliss, feasts, festivities and pleasures, a faithful companion of Lada, the Goddess of love."
See "Delight" from the section "Gods of the Eastern and Southern Slavs".
j) "NUMBER-BOG - God of time and astrologers."

Prillwitz forgery.
Here are the helpers of the national-pagans! Either they simply do not exist, or they are Distorted gods, disfigured by the false faith of the essence, partly duplicating the functions of the prototypes. More or less correctly, Istarkhov listed more or less correctly Svarog, Perun, Svyatovid, Lada, Khors, Yarilo, Ovsen, Madder, Dazhdbog, Zarya, Belobog, Earth, Lada, Lelya, Polelya, Lelya, Stribog, Kolyada. I live, Pozvizda, Porenuta, Devan and Yaga (the latter, however, he turned into Baba Yoga).
They were also told “NAV is an unreal, unmanifested, otherworldly, invisible, imaginary world, including a false hypostasis of being. This is where the word "obsession" comes from.

The grossest mistake: “delusion” comes from the word “induce” (damage). Well, how with such knowledge in the Russian language, Istarkhov wrote a BOOK ABOUT SLAVIC-RUSSIANS ?!
2) “... and paganism, or Vedism (from the word “Veda” - knowledge), which we will discuss below, is based on real knowledge that can be verified. Real knowledge does not require faith.
Slavic polytheism can be called differently, but Vedism - only with a very big stretch and the proviso that it has nothing to do with Indian Vedism, since there is a huge time gap between the isolation of the Slavs and the birth of Indian Vedism - 1-1.5 thousand years . "Knowledge does not need faith"? Hmm, well, but, at least, in the opinion of Istarkhov, they also do not need an elementary justification? "Knowledge can be tested"? But the test just proves their inconsistency.
3) “The pagan idea of ​​multiple lives, reincarnations (reincarnations) and transitions from one world to another is not only smarter and more interesting than the idea of ​​Christian endless Heaven and Hell. Anyone who is seriously engaged in yoga can be convinced of the truth of this idea from his own experience.
Of course, interest is a purely individual concept, it’s not easy to get into it. But to assert the absolute advantage of the afterlife of any religion based on the experience of yoga is at least not ethical.
4) “For an intelligent practical person, one of the main commandments should be the main pagan commandment: LIVE YOURSELF AND LET OTHERS LIVE.
For all the time of studying paganism, I saw another principle: "be tolerant of those who do not violate the Truth." This principle implies a lot of freedom, but does not require to endure lawlessness and does not preach permissiveness, in contrast to the Istarkhov slogan (which is still not pagan, but "thieves'").
5) “One-God religions claim that there is one absolute truth, although they cannot formulate this truth in any way.
TRUTH, firstly, is multifaceted, secondly, is concrete (clearly and precisely defined), and thirdly, is relative. For example, let's take some true statement. For example, 2 x 2 = 4. Is this statement true? Yes, sure. But is this the only truth? Of course not. There are other truths: 5 x 5 = 25;

3 x 3 \u003d 9, etc. There are many truths, like Gods. This is first. Secondly. Is this statement (2 x 2 = 4) absolute? Of course not. It is specific and relative. It is completely tied to the external context. This is only in decimal notation. In the quaternary number system 2 x 2 = 10, in the ternary system 2 x 2 = 11, in binary = 100. For non-Arabic numerical alphabets (for example, Roman numerals), these expressions 2 x 2 are generally meaningless, there are no such signs.
Note further that absolutization is incorrect. The same Christian absolutization of good and evil does not make sense. Good and evil are not absolute, but relative. Let's take a simpler example. The cat caught and ate the mouse. Is this action good or bad? It depends on the starting point. For whom is evil, and for whom it is good. From the point of view of the mouse, this is evil. From the point of view of a cat, this is good, she can feed herself and her children. You will not find any “common animal” or universal human values.”
Firstly, the principles of not only monotheism speak about a certain single truth (the Slavic concept is Pravda). ALMOST ALL religions of the world speak about the same order for all, about the common laws of being, universal values.

Secondly, if you look for truth by analogy with mathematics, then 2 x 2 = 4 is NOT THE WHOLE TRUTH, BUT ONLY ITS PART. All mathematics would be true: and 2 x 2 \u003d 4, and 5 x 5 \u003d 25, and “the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the legs”, and even such a concept as non-Euclidean geometry and many others. etc. The truth turns out to be unified and irrelevant even in the Istarkhov example, if you look at it as a whole, and not from the edge that is beneficial to someone. But the statement "2 x 2 \u003d 13/78 carats of milk" is just as exactly an irrelevant contradiction to the truth.

Thirdly, if anyone talks about good and evil, then it’s not for nationalists with “cleaned brains”. Carnivorous creatures kill to get enough, everyone kills in defense - these are the norms, because there is no killing beyond the necessary. Another person kills for the sake of sadistic pleasure - this is an irrelevant evil. Extramarital intercourse with different partners without the goal of conceiving a child, but in order to get pleasure - seems good, but it only seems: promiscuous sex life leads to a series of hormonal disruptions in a woman (due to a different group of sperm of each partner) and to a loss of faith in love and family happiness . This evil. Save a child's life by not having an abortion - this is good: you sacrificed your own comfort for the sake of someone else's life. There are millions of examples. Good and Evil become obvious, one has only to get to the bottom of the act. The relativity of Good and Evil is an argument specially invented by the scum, a tool of self-justification.
6) » Russian Orthodox domes are an architectural form of expression of the male phallus. phallic symbol. A symbol of male power, sensuality, love, pleasure, fertility, the continuation of the human race. That is why the beauty of Orthodox churches is realized by everyone on a subconscious level. If you look in Moscow, on Red Square at St. Basil's Cathedral, you will see in the most obvious way that these phalluses are not cut off, symbolic folds of skin go below the heads. You will see the same thing in the bell tower of Ivan the Great Kremlin, the churches of Kizhi, etc.

Well, let's reduce everything to the phallus! In fact, the Earth among the Slavs is a uniquely female deity, why should it suddenly stick out into the sky ... hmm, a penis?
7) “During prayer, the Slavs maintained pride and masculinity. The prayers of the Slavs are mainly praise and doxology to the Gods, usually in the form of a hymn. The Slavs praised their Gods, hence the concept of "Slavs".

See the chapter "What is paganism?" and item 6 of my criticism of the Veleskniga in the processing of D. Dudko.
8) “Regarding the sacrifices in the pagan book of Veles, in the text of tablet No. 4 it is literally written: “The gods of the Rus do not take human or animal sacrifices, only fruits, vegetables, flowers, grain, milk, cheese drink (whey), infused with herbs, and honey, and never a live bird or a fish. But the Varangians and Alans give a different sacrifice to the gods - a terrible, human one, we should not do this, because we are Dazhd-god's grandchildren and cannot follow in the footsteps of others ... ".

See the chapter "Some aspects of the paganism of the Slavs". And, in the end, voluntary suicide during the burial of a relative can be considered a victim.
9) "And this means destroying your soul, getting the appropriate karma and the corresponding opportunities for reincarnation."

Karma and the wheel of rebirth are attributes of Hinduism, Brahmaism and Buddhism. In the paganism of the Slavs, karma is replaced by God's judgment on earth or posthumous retribution, and rebirth was considered an anachronism already in the 9th-8th centuries. BC e., when crouched burials were replaced by elongated ones.
10) “A complete revolution is divided into 12 zodiac eras, each of which lasts 2160 years. This time is called Kolo (circle) of Svarog.

Excuse me, who is the name? By me, for example, no, so what, it turns out that I am not a pagan?!
11) “A natural question arises. Why did paganism, being much smarter and richer, lose a significant period of time to Christianity? There are several reasons for this, of which there are two main ones. The first reason is the advent of the unfavorable Age of Pisces.

Well, of course, when it is impossible to answer a direct question, then, in order not to lose face, one should refer to fate, providence or the stars.
12) “When our ancestors went into battle and shouted “Ur-r-ra”, then this growl is a way to use the power of our animal ancestors.”

As far as I can tell, during a frontal attack on the enemy, the Russian troops often commemorated ... hmm, a fallen woman, or threatened to make it known that with an unknown mother. Moreover, this was often recorded in the records of foreign military reporters back in the days of Tsarist Russia. If Istarkhov is right, then it turns out that in battle the Russians were very preoccupied with sexual energy or carried out a kind of envolting on the mothers of the enemy.
13) "The task of this work, due to the limitation in volume, does not include a detailed description of the Russian pagan religion."

Actually, was it worth taking it then, if for a number of reasons, the author of “Strike ...” cannot say anything specific?
14) "[Prince Vladimir] Calls for the erection of idols previously unknown in Russia and not only to worship them, but also to sacrifice innocent boys."

However, Istarkhov himself, while listing the Russian gods, included the Kyiv pantheon of Vladimir in their composition. And then the "unknown gods"?
15) “Only after that did Vladimir introduce Christianity by force, without causing a particularly powerful resistance that could cost the life of this Zhidenka.”

In the chapter “The Baptism of Russia”, I have detailed what kind of resistance was “not caused”.
16) “Christians keep quiet about the fact that they did the same with the Russian national religion - paganism, when they captured Russia. They broke, crushed and burned the national pagan Gods, persecuted and crushed the Magi, Old Believers and all other clergymen. Time passed, and Christians received all the same in relation to themselves.

Here Istarkhov impudently contradicts himself: the use of violence of such a degree when converting INEVITABLY causes stiff resistance.
17) “For 3 million years of pagan civilizations, the earth has not suffered losses…”

And where did such a figure come from, if man emerged from the animal world only 2 million years ago, and the first beliefs - a maximum of 800 thousand years?
18) “The prince of Novgorod Yaroslav, whom the people called the Wise for his love of books and the foundation of a great library, played a big role in the preservation of ancient pagan manuscripts.”

About Yaroslav, his faith and nicknames were mentioned in the chapter “Pagan Slavs. P.S".
19) “Today, the following are available to the public: “The Book of Veles”, “The Tale of Igor's Campaign”, “The Tale of Bygone Years” by Nestor, “Boyanov Hymn”, some other primary sources and, of course, the entire folk epic: legends, myths, fairy tales, proverbs , sayings, etc. All this material is not enough to restore the Russian religion in full, so you have to study other pagan religions in parallel: Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Bon. This is useful because for all the differences between these pagan religions, many ideas and principles have different forms, but the same essence, since all these religions have grown from one religious root - Vedism.

Considering that two of the four primary sources indicated are definitely fakes, and then the reader is sent to look for a folk epic and study Eastern religions (although Celtic and Scandinavian paganism can be considered the closest to the religion of the Slavs), then the conclusion suggests itself (especially in the light of p. 13): Istarkhov has the MOST SURFACE INFORMATION about the paganism of the Slavs, moreover, taken from dubious sources. Difficult for him, apparently, relations with the history of pre-Mongolian Russia.

[To be honest - and with history in general. What is the phrase: "Hitler set the task of repeating the feat of Svyatoslav and crushing the old Jewish nest of Itil-Stalingrad"! In fact, during the time of Hitler, Russians already lived on the Volga, so Hitler’s “feat” can only be compared with Batu’s invasion!]

And if everything is so bad, then should our hero so often appeal to Russian (hmm, let it be) patriotism through the mention of pagan gods?
You ask, why do Istarkhov and his followers need all this? From myself I will say: obviously not from a sincere belief in the gods or the presence of patriotism. And so, in the “Strike” itself, the carried away author blurts out more than once:
“Money makes a person freer” (highlighted by Istarkhov);

"Unleashed sexuality makes a person free."

“When real Russian pagans come to power sooner or later in Russia, it is best to remake this temple into a temple of pagan and Vedic religions and into a functioning museum on the history of religion. It will be more constructive. And instead of crosses on the domes of churches, we will strengthen the Swastika! Adolf Hitler dreamed of this.”

“When we come to power, we will erect a monument to him [Kornilov] and to all other patriots of Russia.”

“Now WE will pick up the baton from the heroes of the White Movement.

We will raise the banners that have fallen from their hands!

We will paint powerful new symbols on these banners!

We will connect titanic forces to our movement - the forces of our Russian Gods!

But when we win, we will remember that they were ahead of us!

Eternal glory to the heroes of the White Movement!

“Hitler's Nazism is not just National Socialism, as those who seek to hide true information try to present it. German Nazism is first of all a new religion, one of the variants of neo-paganism.”

"When we come to power, we will establish dry law."

“In particular, it is naive to think that with the help of elections alone, power can be taken away from the Jewish mafia. This is unlikely. They took power from us by force, and it is by force that we can return it back.”

"When the Russians take power in Russia and write real, beneficial laws for the Russian nation."

“Therefore, our first task is to replicate the ideas of Russian nationalism and Russian national religion.”

“The number one task for the Russian economy is to bring Russian nationalists to power. That's the whole economy." (highlighted by me)

“It is one thing when the Jews themselves, for provocative purposes, blow up explosives near synagogues and raise a howl in order to strangle the Russian national movement. And quite another is people's spontaneous anti-Jewish terrorism. There is nothing more terrible for the Jews.”

“One of the strongest methods of struggle is civil disobedience. Failure to comply with the orders and orders of the authorities. All the seeming power of the government lies only in the mindless obedience of the people. If the majority of the population, including the security forces, will not obey the government, then all the power and strength of the government will instantly turn into dust.” (Highlighted by Istarkhov)

That's all the goals - money, a lot of power, terror against Jews, propaganda of Hitler and paganism, and, perhaps, somewhere on the edge of the subconscious - a dream of women screaming in the squares: "I want a child from Istarkhov."

And the methods are to touch upon the desire for mysticism by Atlantis and Sirius, to find those to blame for everything, including problems with potency (necessarily - not from the audience !!!), to pump readers' paranoia with their malicious intrigues, and finally - to throw the time-tested slogan "piss of goats" ! Checked! Working!

All this can be funny. Some of you will find this attractive. But I would not at all want the old Jewish doctor who treated me in my childhood by the name of Perun to be beaten to death in the entrance by the doctor of "Jewish studies" - a dumb-headed bald bastard of true "Aryan" blood!
“The swastika will still rise and shine above the earth! May the Sun God RA help us in this!”
Perun, if you don’t hold SUCH evil on us, don’t let THIS happen.

(taken from the book by S. Lifantiev (The Lurking Wolf) "The ABC of a Beginner Pagan")

This book is written in a tough, specific genre, that genre along with information-rich content. The first reading of a book can cause a storm of emotions, which can significantly complicate the assimilation and perception of information. Most likely, it will not be possible to read, master and perceive a book at a time. I advise everyone, after you read the book, take a break of 10 days and only then calmly read the text again.

The subsequent re-reading is almost always more interesting than the initial reading. It is not for nothing that there is a saying among the intelligentsia: "Intelligents do not read books, they re-read them." The book is written as simply as possible to make it easy to understand. Although the density of the information provided is extremely high. The most important thing is that the book is written from the position of a pagan lost in modern Russia. I am sure that after reading the book for the second time, you will definitely perceive this work and will not be upset about the lost time.

Well, if you read this book for the third time, it will help you move into the pagan information field. It will change your consciousness. It will help to wake up your subconscious, genetic memory, raise and wake up our Russian Gods. We are the Aryans - the sons of our Gods. There is more to us than we can imagine. Our gods are in our genes, they are inside us. In this information, a huge power and energy is hidden. This information will help us to become a thousand times more powerful to achieve victory, true spiritual power, and prosperity.

Book title
Year of printing: 1999
author: Istakhov. V.A
Number of pages: 109
Format:PDF
Size: 6.09mb

At that wonderful time of the formation of “democracy” in Russia, when it suddenly turned out that EVERYTHING is possible, what ideas, opinions, teachings and great charismatics did not appear on one sixth of the land! I remember very well those times when the Soviet people, hungry for everything new, "unstagnant", rushed in a crowd to an Orthodox church, charging water from Chumak along the way, putting Yeltsin on a tank, voting for Zyuganov, sympathizing with Zhirinovsky, firmly believing in MMM. Among the many different plans of newly emerging interests in this crowd of people who suddenly found themselves without a homeland - their Soviet homeland, for the vast majority did not know another, then only a very rudimentary feeling woke up - an interest in their national roots. The already mentioned attraction to the Church - even if only to its external attributes. Interest in the Cossacks and the White Guards - then such "singers" as Gazmanov and Malinin played great on this interest. To the royal family. People increasingly wanted to know how their grandparents lived before Lenin, five-year plans, collective farms and the Komsomol. On an unprincipled lack of fish, as they say, any cancer is a fish, which probably partially explains the appearance of such a passionate fighter for the restoration of desecrated Russian history as the charismatic of the new time, writer and idol of "patriotic" youth Vladimir Istarkhov.

This gentleman, and, as we will see later, rather a comrade, outlined his ideas about the arrangement of life in post-Soviet Russia in his fundamental works “Blow of the Russian Gods”, “What is “Dead Water”?” and etc.

According to Istarkhov (let's not forget that he is still a "patriot"), all the troubles of the Universe come from the Jews and their terrible invention - world religions based on the Old Testament - Judaism and Christianity (he does not attack Islam, which he honestly admits , so as not to offend Muslims - they are not scoops and Europeans, they can always give a hat for their Mohammed), as well as from Freemasonry, however, also a Jewish invention. As proof, he cites to the Soviet reader inexperienced in theological concepts passages of Holy Scripture, designed to prove any unattractiveness of Christianity. We will omit the theological side of the works of the great writer - we will leave this work for those people who have the greatest right to speak on such topics, for representatives of the Church. But, I think, they will not enter into polemics with the "writer" - and they will do it right.

We are also interested in the other side of the book - concerning what exactly Istarkhov offers in return for Orthodoxy to a Russian person? The personality of the writer is also interesting - in the end, the Russian people have the right to know the one who gave him the way to get rid of the "religious dope".

Instead of the Orthodox faith, Istarkhov invites us to return to the faith of our distant ancestors, namely, to paganism. He calls it Vedism, from the sacred books of Hinduism - the Vedas. What kind of religion is this - paganism? And how does Istarkhov know so much about her? The question is not idle, given that the thousand-year-old Orthodox Russia has thoroughly forgotten its former traditional beliefs. It is not surprising - there were many Slavic, as well as Finnish, Baltic tribes on the territory of the future Russian state, and each tribe had its own pantheon, its own gods, its own rituals. It is possible to unite them only conditionally on one basis - there were many of these gods. Little is known to modern science about the beliefs of the then Slavs - our distant ancestors worshiped the elements, believed in the relationship of people and various animals, and made sacrifices to the gods. The all-Russian pantheon tried to create in 980 the prince of Kyiv Vladimir Svyatoslavich - in order to unite the tribes of his empire with a common religious cult. Created, as we now know, to finally destroy and abandon paganism forever. Prince Vladimir entered Russian history under the name of St. Vladimir. Information about paganism is scarce - scientists learn about the higher deities of the ancient Rus from Christian teachings against paganism, about various lower deities - spirits - from folklore (tales, ancient rites). An important role is played by comparisons with the beliefs of other pagan peoples. It should be noted here that there is no fundamental difference between the beliefs of an Eskimo, an ancient Aztec, an Egyptian, a Roman, a Slav or a Papuan. Metropolitan Macarius wrote in the 16th century about the pagans: “Such are their filthy prayer places: forests, and stones, and rivers, and swamps, springs, and mountains, and hills, the sun and the moon, and stars, and lakes. And, to put it simply, everything that exists was worshiped by yaki God, and honored, and sacrificed.” And, if we can still name at least some ancient Slavic gods - these are Perun, and Veles, and Mokosh, and Rod - then the rite, the very act of religious worship, is probably completely lost.

All this did not prevent Comrade Istarkhov from forming his own paganism, Vedism, and teaching this elixir as an old new Russian religion. In order not to be unfounded, let me quote the "writer" - the nonsense of his creations is better than any criticism:

“Lada is the mother of most Gods, the Mother of God, the Goddess of beauty ... The words “sweet”, “fritters” and even the English “lady” come from Lada ...

“Ra is the common name for the sun god. From here come the words: “culture” (cult of the god Ra), “RAINBOW” (arc of the God Ra), “Dawn”, “Joy”, “Hospitable”, “WORK” (since work is done during the day, a person sleeps at night), “ Plant", "Rassey" (this is how our country is correctly called) ".

The lack of own knowledge gives the author an impetus to a wide flight of fantasy. So, without hesitation, he replaces the “missing” knowledge about the ancient Russian gods with ancient Egyptian (as in the above example) and Indian deities especially dear to his heart - Valu, Agni, Vishnu, Krishna - these “gods” from modern polytheism, as it were, should give authority " Istarch gods. True, his strange choice (and indeed, since every primitive people professes polytheism, why not add to Veles and Mokoshi and Quetzalcoatl, and Witzli Putsli, and Zeus the Thunderer, and the king of monkeys Sun Wukong) the author refers to the Aryan origin of Hinduism. Indeed, even Baba Yaga, beloved by Russian children according to Istarkhov, is actually Baba Yoga! What about Baba Yaga! I quote: “We are Russians, and all other Aryans are all yogis!” That's it! Go bet!

The example of pagan India is, in fact, a wonderful example and speaks volumes. That's just ... not in favor of Istarkhov's ideas. In the book “Blow of the Russian Gods”, he gives the deepest excursion into history for a completely ignorant reader (according to Istarkhov, who clearly has some secret knowledge hidden from scientists, Russians are the ancestors of all mankind. They are the descendants of the Atlanteans and Etruscans, who gave the world writing and still God knows how many blessings), but history is a concrete thing, and for a person who knows it not from the opuses of Fomenka and others like him, it is not amenable to interpretation and idle conjecture. So, knowing at least a little of our national history and comparing it with the history of India, we can draw several conclusions not in favor of the latter.

In the 10th century, the Great Empire of St. Vladimir (“a velvety zhidenka” according to Istarkhov, what a writer’s lexicon!) entered the highest stage of its development - at the end of the century, Russia was illuminated by the light of the Christian faith in its eastern, Byzantine rite. Of course, one should not deny the purely political background of the Grand Duke's decision - the young state, united by the power of the sword, needed a single ideology. But Vladimir had a choice - Islam, Catholicism, Judaism, in the end, he could continue creating his own religion from pieces of the beliefs of each of the conquered tribes, with which he began. But the prince chose Orthodoxy.

Since that time, Holy Russia begins - and under banners with the Savior depicted on them, Russian regiments went into battle against the Polovtsians and Tatars, German knights and the Polish gentry. With the name of Christ, the Russian knights went to defend the Fatherland from enemies constantly encroaching on it, with the words “God confirm! God strengthen! May we all be one forever! the Russian lands, scattered from the former princely strife, were united under the rule of the Moscow ruler. In the terrible years of internecine strife and its consequences - the Tatar-Mongol yoke, only the Orthodox faith supported the threads that connected the Russian people, who found themselves divided by many borders. In countless battles for the right to live on their land, the Russian people forged their military prowess and inviolability of faith as a guarantor of their victory. But let's listen to Istarkhov: “A Christian cannot be proud…. Because of the cultivation of these virtues, a miserable people is brought up who endures everything. The right word, is he talking about Russians?

Istarkhov: “After the murder of Russian priests in 988 in 1917, the Jews killed the tsar and further destroyed the elite of society in layers ...”.

It is here, in these words, that the catch lurks - the pseudo-historian just like that, with one stroke of the pen, took and crossed out 1,000 (a thousand !!!) of these glorious years from Russian history. As if they never happened - but how? After all, then the harmony of presentation does not work out - after all, the Slavs somehow coped with this thousand years without wooden idols, and how they coped! The greatest state on far from the most promised land was built.

Now let's look at India. Yes, she preserved paganism almost in its original form. This, of course, is not Istarch's "Vedism", but .... Hinduism, what is it? And here's what - there is no such religion, there is only an area of ​​\u200b\u200bits existence - mainly, of course, India. Each region of India has its own local tradition, favorite gods and goddesses, special rites and customs, favorite holidays and places of pilgrimage. There are so many gods there that any attempts to list or count them are countless! At the origins of Hinduism were not only the ancient Aryans - it is a multi-layered pie from the beliefs of the ancient population of India, the Vedic religion of the Aryans and the later influences of Buddhism and Jainism. There are many currents in Hinduism - and Sikhs. and Jains. and orthodox Brahminists, and representatives of the reformative Tantric teachings - all consider themselves Hindus. It is so difficult to understand the heap of rules, the complex pantheon and the rituals of Hinduism that from time to time reformers appear who “clean up” Hinduism that has grown over thousands of years from all sorts of “litter” and announce the emergence of a new trend of this pseudo-religion. So it was, for example, in the 1960s in the United States, when a certain Bhaktivedanta Swami, a native of Calcutta, created Krishnaism, now widely known thanks to its annoying adherents.

After the capture by the Aryans, India did not become a single country - there were many states on its territory. Between them there were incessant wars, often culminating in the fall of some and the promotion of other dynasties, until, finally, India fell under the rule of Great Britain. And only in 1947, England, in fact, artificially, "at its own will", created a single state with its capital in Delhi. Such a fate would have awaited Russia, if Perun had risen above the waters of the Dnieper to this day.

Looking at young worshipers of Krishna, at unwashed ascetics of Hinduism with ribs sticking out in all directions, at numerous gurus and yogis, you involuntarily wonder - can a sane modern young man, as they say, “in all seriousness”, worship stone and garlic? It is easy to mock the Bible, which Istarkhov does, if you do not understand and do not want to understand its meaning - but what in return? If the texts of the Bible are nonsense, then what is this: “Once Vishnu and Brahma argued about which of them is more powerful. To resolve their dispute and reveal the truth. Shiva appeared in the form of a huge pillar of fire. This column looked like a fire devouring the world at its death, and sparkled in the midst of fiery wreaths. Brahma told Vishnu, "You go up and I will go down to find its end." Vishnu turned into a huge boar and dug the earth for a thousand years, but never reached the base of the pillar. And Brahma became a snow-white swan with burning eyes, as fast as a thought. For a thousand years he flew up, but never reached the top of the fiery column. When they came back, Shiva told them the truth. Since then, they worship him in all three worlds. The pillar of fire, neither the beginning nor the end of which they could not reach, was the lingam - the phallus of Shiva. I wonder if the author of "Strike of the Russian Gods" worships someone's phallus?

In this context, Istarkhov's idea of ​​allegory is interesting. The great writer invites us to understand the text of Holy Scripture as it is, literally, without interpretation: “Interpretations are a way to fool our heads. You can come up with hundreds of different interpretations, and why should one believe in these interpretations? ... You can interpret whatever you want and how you want, but the fact remains: Christians are mystical cannibals who mentally eat human flesh and drink blood. But, a little later in his book, the writer “forgets”: “Paganism is knowledge about the world, given in a figurative and symbolic form. This form helps ordinary people understand complex things with the help of worldly analogies. For example, when it is said that the god Svarog married the goddess Lada and she gave birth to children for him, this actually means that some other, more complex process is taking place. Well, what are you, my dear Vladimir Alekseevich, being disingenuous - after all, this is an example of a real interpretation! You refuse to interpret the Bible, but you yourself carry God knows what! Why not understand this written (where did you get it, by the way - did the Atlanteans whisper or familiar hysterics-yogis?) Literally - Lady Lada gave birth to her Svarog svarozhichi, like baked pancakes, and that's it?

You can criticize Istarkhov endlessly - after all, all his conclusions are based on the following conviction - only paganism gives a person real knowledge, as opposed to the Christian religion, where you only need to believe. But the "Vedic knowledge" seems to have been taken by the author from some other reality.

Istarkhov: "Christianity is a religion based on faith, and paganism, or Vedism, on real knowledge that can be verified."

The knowledge of Istarkhov himself in world and national religion, as well as in philology, is far from flawless. Basing your concept on a phantasmagoric fictional foundation, how can you build something really serious and necessary for your people? Why is it necessary to fool the heads of those best representatives of the Russian people with an absurd heresy, who today is still worried about the fate of the Motherland? This is either pure stupidity - or a deliberate distortion of facts, the purpose of which is to distract some of those nationalist-minded people who want to know the truth about Russia and its historical fate, but, unfortunately, receive it from pseudo-historians like Istarkhov. So, not to be unfounded:

Istarkhov: "In the Russian Vedas, the Era of Pisces is called fierce"

What are the “Russian Vedas” to which the author constantly refers? Where did he get them? Most likely - this is the so-called "Veles book". Undoubtedly, the text of this book flatters the vanity of the Russian heart - our history is pushed back by its texts for many years before Kievan Rus, many previously unknown facts are being clarified. But! It is interesting to find this book. It happened in 1919 - in the midst of the new Time of Troubles. The book was found by the White Guard Colonel Isenbek. The tablets found in the estate of the princes of Zadonsk were taken abroad, translated and published there. I recall footage from the film "Running" - a former officer of the White Army in rags stands on the streets of Constantinople and sells wooden toys: "Does not beat, does not break, but only somersaults." Many thousands of our compatriots ended up in a foreign land without a penny for their souls, without shelter and livelihood. Among them were both less and more enterprising.

Istarkhov: “The Roman rulers saw the danger in Christianity very late, and this ruined the great empire.<…>In 325 AD in the Roman Empire officially and actually won Christianity. Christianity became the state religion and obscurantism began".

"Old" Rome fell in 476 under the blows of the barbarian peoples and its own impotence. But the new, Christian Rome existed for another 1000 years! And it's just a change of era. The name "Byzantium" was given to the eastern empire already in the Renaissance. The “division” of the Roman Empire into Western and Eastern represented only the formal legal boundary of epochs, while the historical transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages took place later, in the 7th-8th centuries. But even after that, Byzantium retained many traditions of ancient statehood and culture, which made it possible to distinguish it into a special civilization, modern, but not identical to the medieval Western European community of peoples. Among its value orientations, the most important place was occupied by the idea of ​​the so-called "political orthodoxy", which combined the Christian faith, preserved by the Orthodox Church, with the imperial ideology of the "Holy Power", which went back to the ideas of Roman statehood. Together with the Greek language and Hellenistic culture, these factors ensured the unity of the state for almost a millennium. Roman law was the basis of Byzantine law. Ethnic self-consciousness for a long time (until the 12th-13th centuries!) did not play a significant role in the self-identification of imperial citizens, who were officially called Romans (in Greek - Romans). From the Eastern Roman Empire, the light of Christianity reached Russia. Obscurantism is just what was going on at that time outside the Orthodox civilization, in Western Europe.

Istarkhov: “In the Hebrew language, the word “Christ” does not exist at all”.

A thoughtful remark - after all, the word Christ (Messiah) is of Greek origin, even a child knows this.

Istarkhov: “According to generally accepted data in science, Christians burned thirteen million people at the stake. In general, whom did Christians burn? The ones they called heretics. And who are these heretics? These are dissenters who disagree with Christian delusional myths.

For Istarkhov, as well as for another Soviet person, duped by communist anti-religious propaganda, the difference between representatives of different Christian denominations is completely invisible. For a Russian Orthodox person, this difference is fundamental. Istarkhov's words of criticism of Christianity must be extrapolated not to some abstract Christianity that never existed, but to our Russian Orthodox Church. In an old Soviet black-and-white film, a communist attacks a priest, accusing him of the Crusades and the Inquisition. What about Soviet pop? What he? And of course he's on the defensive!

If, instead of reading the mythical “Russian Vedas” and searching for Atlantis, Istarkhov would have taken an interest in Russian history, then he might have been surprised to find out for himself that the Russian Church never traded in the sale of indulgences, fires of the Inquisition and crusades !!! The Latins baptized with fire and sword, the Russian monks - with a spiritual example and feat. Catholics burned - Russians inspired. There were bonfires, especially in the "Germanized" trading republics, Pskov and Novgorod - but history knows only a few cases, and the "witch hunt" was condemned by the highest clergy. It was in that same Veliky Novgorod at the end of the 15th century that the heresy of the “Judaizers” arose, the founder of which is considered to be the Jew Zacharias sent by Lithuania. Probably, such “dissent” is close to the “left hemisphere” yogi (as he calls himself) Istarkhov. The following quote from Istarkhov should also be included in the accusations “not addressed to us”: “And because of Christianity, Europe has not been washed for more than fifteen centuries.” We don’t care about Europe - but in Russia the bath has been respected since ancient times and still, although maybe someone doesn’t know about it.

Istarkhov: "Eternal memory and eternal glory to the Great Hero of Russia - Alexander Nevsky!".

Grand Duke Alexander Nevsky is one of the most revered saints of the Russian Orthodox Church, a wise ruler and a faithful Christian. Only ignorance of this fact, apparently, explains the absence of the Istarkhov label "fuzzy Jew".

Istarkhov: “Today in Moscow there is an association called the All-Light Charter. They teach that there was a sacred script - the All-World Letter, which included 64 lowercase and 83 upper and lowercase letters.

They also operate in Moscow -

The sect "Jehovah's Witnesses" - they assure that the Apocalypse is about to come, and they will be saved.

The Society for Krishna Consciousness - these teach that the experience of understanding the nature of one's Self through the mumbling of a meaningless set of sounds is the perfect religion. The list of stupid organizations is endless.

We Russians do not need to trace our ancestry from the mythical Atlanteans. None of the truly Russian people will suffer from an inferiority complex from the fact that it was not our alphabet that became the prototype of Greek and Latin, but vice versa. Knowing only the main milestones of Russian history - the formation of the previously deserted place of great Russia, the adoption and preservation of the Orthodox faith for a millennium, the skillful opposition to East and West while maintaining national identity, the talent and missionary qualities of our people - we can safely say: even one of these qualities are enough for a nation to be truly Great, but in combination of them we are invincible.

Istarkhov: “Well, why do we Russians need Estonia?”.

Indeed, Estonia is absolutely useless to us. But Yudenich is easy to understand - after all, the logical chain is easy to continue. And why do we Russians need Chechnya? Tataria? Bashkiria? Yakutia? Karelia? Caucasus? Siberia? Far East?

Istarkhov-philologist: “To understand that Russians and Germans are kindred peoples, it is enough to at least look at the names of the peoples. Compare Prussia and Belarus. One root. Prussia is Pomeranian Russia. Prussians are Pomeranian Russians.

Prussia is a historical region of the Baltic States, originally inhabited by the Baltic tribe of the Prussians. Prussians are Balts, not Germans or Slavs, the same as the ancestors of Lithuanians and Latvians. The German Catholic Teutonic Order (Masonic according to Istarkhov) Prussia was captured in the XIII century.

Istarkhov: "According to modern data, Akhenaten and his sister-wife Nefertiti were representatives of an unearthly satanic civilization from the constellation Sirius."

No comment!

Istarkhov the historian: “Although the Old Testament of the Bible is an adapted and softened version of the Talmud…”.

The Talmud is a collection of dogmatic, religious, ethical and legal provisions of Judaism that took shape in the 4th century. BC. - V c. n. e. This book, stuffed with mysticism and occultism, was the "final blow" of Judaism to the teachings of Christ that had overcome its dogmatic bonds. So, being written later than both the Torah (Old Testament - XII-II centuries BC) and the Gospel, the Talmud by no means can be their progenitor. In general, Istarkhov constantly points to the continuity of Judaism, Christianity and communism, considering these three religions not a consistent development of one from the other. According to Istarkhov, both Christianity and communism were invented exclusively by Jews. Yes, communism grew, of course, out of Christianity as a religion - but as an ANTI-religion!!! What an antagonist! That is why true believers consider Soviet power to be the power of the devil. Istarkhov considers Judaism, Christianity and communism to be a single complex of religions - in fact, Orthodoxy considers both the first and third to be satanic. It is not surprising that the Jews also consider those who believe in Christ to be their natural enemies: “A pagan (i.e. non-Jew) who sticks his nose into the Torah (and other Jewish scriptures) is condemned to death. For, as it is written, this is our inheritance, not theirs” (Sanhedrin 59a). “Balaam (Jesus) has risen from the dead and is being punished by boiling hot semen. Those who ridicule the words of the Jewish sages and sin against Israel boil in hot excrement” (57a Gittin).

Istarkhov-expert: “In those days in Rome, they crucified on the cross only for pederasty”.

The writer strikes with his complete ignorance of history, respectively, of those historical processes and relationships that, like fibers, make up the matter of Time. What was previously spoken in a whisper is on everyone's lips today. Pederasty in the ancient world had an ordinary character - in those days it was a completely normal and ordinary phenomenon. Both Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great practiced homosexual intercourse. When Jesus was born, Rome was ruled by its greatest emperor, the "father of the Fatherland" Octavian Augustus. So, Mark Antony claimed that Octavian achieved his adoption by Caesar only with the help of sexual contacts. Strange, but no one crucified him for pederasty.

This is where Istarkhov would look for the reasons for the collapse of Great Rome. Just like Comrade Istarkhov, who speaks Russian and possibly has Caucasoid features, the Roman citizens of the time of Christ believed that the very fact of their birth in Italy guaranteed them the great qualities of their ancestors. A monstrous decline in morals, sodomy and bloody entertainment, apathy for work and a lack of interest in military affairs (remember the famous "Bread and Circuses!", When Roman citizens, turning themselves into plants, gorged themselves on free bread, spending time in stadiums, and at that time barbarians "protected" the borders of the empire, and millions of slaves grew bread). Was it not this vicious circle that caused the decline of Rome?

And how similar this situation is to modern Russia! Hordes of immigrants from Central Asia are building houses in Russia for food, laying roads, and the most equipped unit of the Russian army consists of Chechen hirelings. And, the worst thing is that the descendants of the great nation degenerated, for the most part, into the Soviet people, with grateful interest looking into the mouth of any rogue, ready to shut his mouth with a sweet handout, “reminding” of great Russia, Atlanteans and yogis.

The mediocrity, illiteracy of the “writer” Istarkhov, his tendency to juggling and distorting, to loud slogans and references “to nowhere”, strange phrases like “you should always appreciate life in the world in which you have been given the opportunity to live in this present period of time”, “one who does not love himself cannot love other people”, “live yourself and let others live”, constant references to Freud (whom the author himself calls “standing at the origins of the sodomite movement”), denial of everything and love for mysticism - all this resembles a painfully familiar way of thinking. Purely Jewish, all-denying, deconstructive, obese thinking. And another quote comes to hand.

Istarkhov: “In general, a quarter is our man”.

Why only a quarter? And a half-Jew? And whose is ours? Perhaps the whole clue lies in the fact that Istarkhov himself is a quarter-Jew. Then his pathological hatred of the Jewish tribe is easily explained. After all, it is impossible to explain it by a set of that stupid nonsense that the author scribbled in his stupid little book.

Not love for Russia, not devotion to the roots of their great Motherland forced Istarkhov (which, of course, is a pseudonym) to write his stupid lampoons. Most likely, all this is just the envy of a small man to those of his relatives who, in a dramatic hour for Russia, managed to grab a bigger jackpot.

And, finally, I will allow myself another quote from the "maestro": “... in response, show the cookie. This is our pagan symbol"

Your feedback
RELATED ARTICLES
Useful
"The Satanic Bible" by Anton Szandor Lavey, Church of Satan and biography of the founder
Advertising
Warcraft 3 hero quotesWarcraft 3 hero quotes

New
The Paradoxical Theory of Change: Stay where you are to moveThe Paradoxical Theory of Change: Stay where you are to move
Aphorisms and quotes by M. I. Tsvetaeva.  Aphorisms and quotes by M. I. Tsvetaeva. "Poetry and the fate of Tsvetaeva Tsvetaeva's statements about life
Types of behavioral disordersTypes of behavioral disorders
Coursework development of creative imagination in children of primary school ageCoursework development of creative imagination in children of primary school age
impulsive behavior.  Impulsive person.  What is he?  How to deal with impulsive behaviorimpulsive behavior. Impulsive person. What is he? How to deal with impulsive behavior
Individual developmental activities with children We read, count and develop speechIndividual developmental activities with children We read, count and develop speech
Neuropsychological correction of children with ADHD Let's play with objectsNeuropsychological correction of children with ADHD Let's play with objects
The effectiveness of the use of modern pedagogical technologies in the educational processThe effectiveness of the use of modern pedagogical technologies in the educational process
Conditions for preparing a child for school in a dowConditions for preparing a child for school in a dow
Psychological preparation of the child for schoolPsychological preparation of the child for school
Sobibor is the only successful uprising of prisoners of the death campSobibor is the only successful uprising of prisoners of the death camp
Portal for the student.  Self-training

© Portal for the student. Self-training, 2022
Feedback map of site About the site