NEUROTECHNOLOGIES & NON CONSENTING HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION

TARGETED VICTIMS'...DON'T TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER.  YOUR ARE THE MESSENGERS OF
TRUTH

Facts which at first seem improbable will, even on scant explanation, drop the cloak which has hidden them and stand forth in naked and simple beauty.
—Galileo Galilei

 The Michael Mosley you tube link is an adept description in the use of Neurotechnologies in the form of TRANCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION'S, and what this technology is capable of doing.  In the case of Targeted Individual's, not unlike the link to Mosley's description - it has been illegally used experimentally, and without the consent of the Target for Offensive Military Purpose to deliberately IMPAIR: COGNITIVE, BEHAVIORAL, MOTOR, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTIONS, and to INFLICT MASSIVE LEVELS OF PAIN
Michael Mosley has areas of his brain turned off - The Brain: A Secret History - BBC Four
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMR_T0mM7Pc

I, HAVE NEVER, NOR WILL I EVER GIVE LEGAL or WILLING CONSENT - to the ILLEGAL OFFENSIVE USE OF WEAPONIZED NEUROTECHNOLOGIES TO DELIBERATELY IMPAIR,  ALTER AND/OR MODIFY  THE COGNITIVE NEUROLOGICAL AND/OR BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF MY NEUROLOGICAL, BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION FROM  ITS NATURAL NEUROLOGICAL AND/OR BIOLOGICAL FLOW -
WHAT HAS TRANSPIRED IS THE ILLEGAL, NON CONSENTING USE OF EXPERIMENTAL WEAPONIZED NEUROTECHNOLOGIES - AND OTHER BIOMETRIC AND NON LETHAL WEAPONS THAT HARNESS TO ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM - IN ORDER TO DEVELOP INTO FULLY OPERATIONAL OFFENSIVE WEAPONRY FOR MILITARY AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY APPLICATIONS - IN THE FIELD OF WAR, BATTLE, AND CROWD CONTROL -

ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN ILLEGALLY USED UPON MY PERSON - TO THAT THESE WEAPONS - AND WEAPONZIED TECHNOLOGIES CAN BE USED IN FUTURE - FOR OFFENSIVE PURPOSES -

"The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated."  - Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief U.S. Prosecutor, Nuremberg Trials

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. "War Made Easy"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrpqnZYAB6w&feature=related

NEUROSCIENCE/NEUROTECHNOLOGIES - NANO-NEUROTECHNOLOGIES - COGNITIVE NEURO-PSYCHOLOGY, COGNITIVE NEURO-PHARMACOLOGICALS, COGNITIVE NEURO-PHYSIOLOGY

TAKE YOUR PICK - IT ALL RELATES TO BRAIN SCIENCE - BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES, REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING: MAPPING, TRACKING, AND STIMULATING for the purpose of COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION - 

“There will be, in the next generation or so, a (Cognitive-Neural) pharmacological or (Nuero/Nano-Technological) method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by (Cognitive-Neural) pharmacological or (Neuro/Nano-Technological) methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”  Aldous Huxley...jtk

"A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror" Alfred W McCoy

In the 50/60’s there was A CIA medical officer’ who said the following about MKULTRA and other behavioral modification, invasive psychological torture techniques, thus he retained is HIPPOCRATIC OATH, TO DO NO HARM.

“Though feeling that anything more then six days of sensory deprivation would “almost certainly cause irreparable damage,” Baldwin agreed to do these “terminal type” tests if the agency would provide both subjects and cover.  In the end, however,  A CIA Medical Officer BLOCKED the PROJECT as, “Immoral and Inhuman,” suggesting that Those Who Favored the Experiment Might ‘VOLUNTEER THEIR OWN HEADS FOR USE in Dr. Baldwin’s ‘NOBEL PROJECT.”

Here is a modern day scientific professional who in 2010 sent out an Online Pledge by a solo neuroscientist by the name of Curtis Bell, who realized much of the work in Research and Development was not being used to ENHANCE human life, but in fact being studied on how to IMPAIR.  As such, he sent out an online Pledge to his fellow scientist peers.
http://neuroethicscanada.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/a-conversation-on-the-neuroethics-of-war/
Neuroscientist Pledge
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEF4RFhhSWZwNktCakYtbTdkd1cxckE6MA

Pledge by Neuroscientists to Refuse to Participate in the Application of Neuroscience to Violations of Basic Human Rights or International Law. We are Neuroscientists who desire that our work be used to enhance human life rather than to diminish it.

We are concerned with the possible use of Neuroscience for purposes that violate fundamental human rights and international law. We seek to create a culture within the field of Neuroscience in which contributions to such uses are unacceptable.

Thus, we oppose the application of Neuroscience to torture and other forms of coercive interrogation or manipulation that violate human rights and personhood. Such applications could include drugs that cause excessive pain, anxiety, or trust, and manipulations such as brain stimulation or inactivation.

Thus, we also oppose the application of Neuroscience to aggressive war. Aggressive war is illegal under international law, where it is defined as a war that is not in self defense. A government which engages in aggressive wars should not be provided with tools to engage more effectively in such wars. Neuroscience can and does provide such tools. Examples include drugs which enhance the effectiveness of soldiers on one side, drugs which damage the effectiveness of soldiers on the other side, and robots that move, perceive, and kill.

As Neuroscientists we therefore pledge:
a) To make ourselves aware of the potential applications of our own work and that of others to applications that violate basic human rights or international law such as torture and aggressive war.
 b) To refuse to knowingly participate in the application of Neuroscience to violations of basic human rights or international law.

As a Targeted Individual - The Field of Nano and Neuro-Science and Technology is CORE and KEY to what is behind some of the Electronic Harassment - it is considered the 21st Century Arms Race - and these State and Corporate sponsored Terrorist's are willing to LITERALLY SACRIFICE ANYONE'S HUMAN LIFE - in order to be IN CONTROL OF THE CONTROLS -

In addition, what I have found are these State, Corporate, and Educational Institutions doing aggressive Research and Development were told they had the PERFECT OUT for not taking CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY for the LEVELS OF INSIDIOUS TORTURE, PAIN, SUFFERING, AND ULTIMATELY DEATH of Targeted Individual's who have all come forward to PROPER AUTHORITIES to get it to STOP. 
 
These Barbarian's and Serial Murderer's, whom I liken to the medical professionals in the age of Nazi, Germany like Dr. Josef Mengele - delude themselves into believing it is somehow for the greater good, to help their soldier's, or because it is a matter of National Security - as such they place the BURDEN and BLAME upon the Target's by THROWING AROUND THE CRAZY CARD - so that NO ONE would BELIEVE THEM. 

Then as the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL SUSTAINS TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VISION DAMAGES, from which ALL TARGET'S have had to SPEND THEIR OWN MONEY to COVER WHAT INSURANCE DID NOT, or what they NO LONGER HAD INSURANCE FOR - these State, Corporate and Educational Sponsored Terrorist's INVOLVED in Research and Development could slip in through the back doors and TAKE via some National Security LETTER, or USA PATRIOT Act mandate, all COMPUTATIONAL MEDICAL, DENTAL and OPTICAL INFORMATION ON THE HUMAN EFFECTS of what these EXPERIMENTAL Weaponized Technologies could do - while the Targeted Individual has been forced to endure the insidious levels of sheer torture, pain, suffering, and violence these Terrorist's were willing to inflict and fire against LAW ABIDING, DEFENSELESS, UNARMED - SET UP - HUMAN TARGET'S.  - The Brain/Neurology and Biology have no FIREWALLS to what these biological-technological weapons can do.

SYNESIS
A JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ETHICS, AND POLICY
Volume 2, 2011
Neurotechnology in National Security, Intelligence, and Defense
http://www.synesisjournal.com/vol2_no2_t1/vol2_t1.html

Written by two Government Employee's in reference to their findings on the Capabilities of using Neurotechnologies amongst other things:  To See How The Brain Function Under Continued Traumatic Experience, To Enhance the Warfighter, To Impair cognitive functions of the Enemy, and found to be considered Biological-Technological Terrorism, and a way to be used for Mass Subjugation.

Instantiating the progress of neurotechnology for applications in national defense intelligence
M. Layne Kalbfleisch. PhD1*, Chris Forsythe, PhD

Abstract
This article outlines a series of intersections that highlight the potential for strategic fruitful support of basic neuroscience research to enhance technological design and training for national defense intelligence efforts. These intersections include ideas related to acclimatizing the defense community for change and adaptation to new definitions of warfare, increasing scientific literacy about neuro imaging methods for improved partnerships between basic and applied research, balancing translation goals between advancing research and enhancing mission capabilities, and aligning social neuroscience paradigms with training needs. The discussion also provides an overview of research activity funded from within and outside Department of Defense agencies from the recent past and work in progress compared with efforts highlighted in the report, “Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications” by the National Research Council (2009). Finally, as a means of discussing the migration of neurotechnologies to national security applications, the notions of fitness and enhancing physical health, well-being and quality of life are presented in the context of products and strategies that people currently adopt for these purposes.

On the Need for neurotechnology in the national intelligence and defense agenda: Scope and trajectory 
 Chris Forsythe, PhD, James Giordano, PhD

excerpt:
In this light, we have identified four interactive areas of neuroscience that could affect and be important for national security; these are:
1. Nano-neuroscience: Nano-substances and devices may be engineered to alter neural networks, induce changes in properties of the nervous system from periphery to brain, and affect sensitivity to internal and/or external stimuli. Nano-neurotechnologies could therefore be used to modify cognitive, emotional and/or behavioral functions, and in this way affect mental and motor capacity, alter mood or cause near- and long-term disability. Such capability might be used to modify the function of national intelligence and security personnel, and/or could be employed in a) combat (both to enhance performance of troops, as well as impair function of enemy warfighters) and/or b) by our enemies as a form of biological-technological terrorism and a means of mass subjugation.

2. Advanced neuropharmacologicals: Augmented cognition and neural performance improvement (and/or degradation) can be achieved through the use of psycho-neuropharmaceuticals. As mentioned above, these agents could be administered via nano- delivery systems that allow enhanced access to the central nervous system (CNS) in ways that maximize biological (and ultimately psycho-social) effect(s), yet could easily elude detection. Similarly, pharmaceuticals can be linked to brain stimulation technologies (vide infra) to synergize effects in modifying specific cognitive, motoric, emotional and/or behavioral processes.

3. Neuro-imaging and neuro-manipulative devices: Current and prospective developments in neuroimaging offer the potential to visualize relatively site- and network-specific brain processes that are putatively involved in (or may explicitly subserve) various cognitive-emotional and behavioral functions. Identifying these neurological axes could provide means to investigate — if not “detect” and/or “reveal” — mental states. But imaging alone, at least in its current iteration(s), while useful in the scientific and medical investigation of cerebral function, may be of limited utility for practical applications of brain~mind science for intelligence and defense purposes. Efforts are underway that focus more upon measuring (i.e., quantifying and qualitatively defining) brain activity, in attempt to provide indications of “what”, if not “why” cognitive and/or emotional processes (such as deceit, intent, aggression, etc.) occur. Obviously, this has given rise to hypothetical “mind reading” scenarios, and, like other aspects of neurotechnological research and applications, has prompted considerable debate about the validity, value and ethical implications of such devices and techniques. Moreover, imaging/ measurement can be yoked to neuro-interventional technologies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, pharmacologicals) to guide or enable manipulation of

neurological activity. Simply put, near-future iterations of these technologies (either as stand-alone modalities, or if used in convergence) makes the notion of biotechnologically “altering brains” to “changing minds” evermore viable.

4.    Neuroinformatics and cyber-neurosystems: The linking of rapidly advancing computational capability to neurotechnology has established three major domains of progress. The first is the use of computational systems and models to augment human cognitive processes (i.e., human-computer interfaces), the second is in reverse-engineering cognitive mechanisms to create computational techniques and systems to achieve efficient and robust machine intelligence(s), and the third is the data banking of information (about neural structure — including genotypes — and function) to facilitate real-time access, analyses and use.

These areas provide foci for iterative work that seeks to
 1) survey and elucidate any and all research, development, testing and evaluation in the field, world-wide;
2) recognize the operational capabilities established by such RDTE;
3) accurately depict the current and projected state-of-the-science, and
4) predict possible benefits, burdens, risks, and consequences of such science-in- application(s),
 5) propose strategies and tactics to enhance potential benefits, and prevent or mitigate any negative trajectories of use,
6) establish the utility, breadth of application and constraints of those technologies deemed (through a process of dialectic, reflective analysis of benefits and risks) to be of greatest benefit to US’ national interests and security, and
 7) dedicate efforts and economic support toward engineering such technologies. To be sure, these tasks, and the development and use of specific neurotechnologies are germane to the national intelligence and defense community.

Neurotechnology and operational medicine
Carey D. Balaban, PhD

excerpt:

Building resilience into operational medicine
Neurotechnology-based computational hybrid models have the capability to facilitate the design of psychologically resilient operational networks. This goal can be realized by a direct application of research from the area termed “psycho-traumatology”, which examines factors that enhance psychological resilience in the face of traumatic experiences. Growth through adversity is a term that describes the positive adaptations and adjustments that can emerge in the process of living through traumatic and threatening situations (59). Linley (60) has made the interesting assertion that three dimensions of wisdom con- tribute to these positive adaptations to adverse events:
1) the recognition of and ability to operate under conditions of uncertainty,
2) the development of a sense of connect- ed detachment (‘integration of affect and cognition’) and
3) the recognition and acceptance of human limitations. It is significant to note that these aspects of wisdom can emerge from the operations of the schema in Figure 1B.

The first two dimensions represent interactions between interoceptive and cognitive components. The third dimension is equivalent to the cognizance of bounded rationality and the recognition that all human decisions are merely satisficing. Our challenge is to design interfaces to convey this view to operational medicine responders and managers such that psychological resilience is em- bedded in the daily practices of operational medicine. If executed correctly, such a simulation platform has the potential to serve as an inductive teaching tool to inculcate the wisdom that lies at the heart of resilience in the face of adversity.

The LAW & NEUROSCIENCE PROJECT
http://www.lawneuro.org/
Every major University in the United States is fully vested in the experimental, developmental, and operational use of nano/neurotechnologies.  In this case, long before the public comprehends, or fully graps the true nature of what these Biological-Technological technologies have the capacity to do.  There are groups already working on how to incorporate their uses into the law.  Basically, to JUDGE and CONVICT a HUMAN BEING - without due PROCESS and/or PROTECTION from how they will be used.  Therefore, This so called PROJECT appears to be. behind portion of OBSTRUCTION OF ACTUAL JUSTICE - against the Targeted Individual - for their own research -
Therefore, they allowed innocent Human Target's to LITERALLY DIE from their TARGETING - so they could have their CLASSES - monitor what is taking place..... and then have their students come up with way in which to USURP the RULE OF LAW - to LOOK FOR ALL THE LOOPHOLES - and CLOSE THOSE LOOPHOLES - so that these TECHNOLOGIES can literally be USED TO DESTROY - HUMAN LIVES.

THE WHOSE, WHO INVOLVED in NEUROTECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW
http://www.macfound.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=lkLXJ8MQKrH&b=1135955&ct=4028697

POTOMAC INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES
Center for Neurotechnology Studies
States they are looking at the MORAL and ETHICAL issues that arise from the use of these technologies, but OMIT to let the public know they are WORKING hand in GLOVE with the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE -in how these technologies can be used to IMPAIR HUMAN BEINGS - without their consent, against their will, and basically - as a from of MASS SUBJUGATION AND CONTROL -

http://potomacinstitute.org/

http://potomacinstitute.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=49&Itemid=71

TOFFLER ASSOC 2008
TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATIONS 2025
see below for PDF file

(Search; Wild Card Technologies - they apply to Neurotechnologies and what they are capable of doing - Also scroll down to WHO the participated)

Toffler Associates published a report looking forward, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION, 2025 held in 2008, experts in various fields, gathered as panelists from National Intelligence, DARPA, Google, Microsoft, Universities, and a myriad of other disciplines who were asked to give their opinions on these emerging science and technologies.
Here is an excerpt:

'WILD CARD" Technologies -
"(3) the ability to leverage neuroscience and neurotechnology to directly affect the cognitive functions of human being from outside the bodies."

The potential of such "wild card" science and technology developments, and others, could change society in myriad ways that even the most forward thinking analysts are only now becoming able to understand"

Here are some quotes from participants in reference to 'WILD CARD TECHNOLOGIES'

"I can design peptides to disrupt cognition. I can put it in water or food."

"You can use neuroscience as a weapon. You can disrupt someone's behavior without killing them. You can make everyone stupid."

"You can do memory hacking."

"You can put codes in the brain. They are working on this in rats."

"You could also make people dumber, and they'd be more apt to be suicide bombers"

"One of the fastest moving sciences is neurotechnology - understanding how the brain works and connections to the brain - the mechanical or drug interface with the brain, manipulation of the brain, etc - could be electrical manipulation devices."

At the end of this report it states -
"US Government officials held a separate Conference on 2025 technology Implications on June 18, 2008. Technical Experts from across the government assessed the potential impacts of the technology advances described in this report. Their conclusions and judgments are classified."

Sandia National Laboratories Department of Energy

Sandia Labs and arm of Lockheed Martin Labs - sponsored a gathering in 2009 - entitled. "THE FOURTH DECADE OF THE MIND - REVERSE ENGINEERING THE HUMAN BRAIN"
“A product of the symposium will be a white paper that will explain why brain science is critical to national security, looking at brain injury and brain maladies, human-machine systems, training, and non kinetic conflict.”